RESIDENT: Promoting Shared Care and Improving Access for Community Mental Health Services in the Edmonton Zone

Evaluate the session

Presenting Author(s): Michele Foster

Co-Author(s): Dr. Vincent I.O. Agyapong, MD, PhD

Date and time: 24 Mar 2018 from 13:45 to 14:00

Location: Bluebell  Floor Map

Presenting Author(s) Names:  Michele Foster

 Co-Author(s) Names: Dr. Vincent Agyapong


 Learning Objectives:

  1. Examine the Therapist Model of Care in Edmonton including factors hindering access to mental health.
  2. Present data from focus groups: access to mental health from the perspective of various stakeholders, including patients and health professionals
  3. Examine the Three-Tier Pathway as a possibility for improved access to community based mental health programs and services.

 Literature References:

 Moran M: CMS Proposes Rule to Reimburse for Psychiatric Collaborative Care. In: Psychiatric News vol. 51. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2016.

 Bonsack C, Wick DH, Conus P: [Family physicians and psychiatrists' collaborative care for mental health problems]. Rev Med Suisse 2014, 10(442):1715-1718.

 Morgan G, Smircich L: The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review 1980, 5:491-500.

 Smith MJ: Contemporary communication research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Inc. In.; 1988.

 Cassell C, Symon G: Qualitative research in work contexts. In C. Cassell, & G. Symon (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 1-13). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. In.; 1994.

Frankfort-Nachmias C, Nachmias D: Research methods in the social sciences. In., 4th edn: New York: St. Martin's Press.; 1992.

Ting-Toomey S: Qualitative research: An overview. In W.B. Gudykunst, & Y.Y. Kim (Eds.), Methods for intercultural communication research (pp. 169-184). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. In.; 1984.

Fryer D: Qualitative methods in occupational psychology: Reflections upon why they are so useful but so little used.  The Occupational Psychologist 1991, 14:3-6.

Denzin NK: The logic of naturalistic inquiry. . Social Forces, 50, 166-182 1971, 50:166-182.

Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Naturalistic inquiry. . In.: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.; 1985.

Marshall C, Rossman GB: Designing qualitative research. . In. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.; 1989.

Van Maanen J: Qualitative methodology. In.: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1983.

Creswell J: A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. In.: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.; 2014.

Kealey DJ, Protheroe DR: The Effectiveness of Cross-Cultural Training for Expatriates: An Assessment of the Literature on the Issue. . International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(2):141-165.

Balsley HL: Quantitative research methods for business and economics. . In.: New York: Random House.; 1970.

Fossey E, Harvey C, McDermott F, Davidson L: Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2002, 36(6):717-732.

Charmaz K: Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. In., 2nd Ed edn: Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage; 2000: 509-535.

Willig C: Introducing qualitative research in psychology In., 2nd Ed edn: Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill Education.; 2008.

Kitzinger J: Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995, 311(7000):299-302.

Wilkinson S: Focus group methodology: a review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1998, 1(3):181-203.

Kidd PS, Parshall MB: Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. . Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 293-308 2000, 10(3):293-308.

Powell RA, Single HM, Lloyd KR: Focus groups in mental health research: enhancing the validity of user and provider questionnaires. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1996, 42(3):193-206.

Guest G: Applied thematic analysis. In.: Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. ; 2012: 11.



The model of care for access to mental health resources in Edmonton is described as a Therapist Based Model of Care (TBMC); patients accessing community based mental health services are also required to have a Mental Health Therapist. Anecdotal evidence suggests this model impedes patients’ access to mental health services and hinders the shared approach to mental health care. There have been no studies which examine the extent of, opportunities for, and barriers to the practice of shared care for mental health patients within the Edmonton zone.


The goal of the study is to examine the TBMC in Edmonton, including factors hindering access to community based mental health services.  A focus will be placed on generating new knowledge on opportunities and barriers to shared care for patients with mental health difficulties. A primary outcome will be development of an ideal shared care model for mental health patients within the Edmonton Zone based on stakeholders feedback.


The views of a diverse group of stakeholders, including health professionals and patients will be examined. Quantitative data collection will involve online and paper based self-administered questionnaires involving a Likert Scale, tailored to either health care professionals or patients, respectively. Subsequently, each group will be invited to participate in final focus group discussions.


As this study is in process, results are not currently available; however, the study will be complete at the end of January.

Add to Calendar