BoD & SCAP LOGIN

RESIDENT: Psychiatric Co-Morbidities in Tic Disorders: Are Current Screening Instruments Suitable?

Evaluate the session


Presenting Author(s): Rachael Nicholls

Co-Author(s): Dr. Tamara Pringsheim, MD, FRCPC; Dr. Davide Martino, MD, FRCPC; Dr. Natalia Szejko, MD.

Date and time: 23 Mar 2024 from 14:00 to 14:15

Location: Hawthorn C  Floor Map

Learning Objectives

1. Review the epidemiology of psychiatric co-morbidities in tic disorders;
2. Evaluate the psychometric properties of four commonly used screening instruments (PHQ-9, GAD-7, ASRS, OCI) when applied to the tic disorders population; and
3. Explore whether established instrument cut-points in the general population are suitable for screening in the tic disorders population.

Literature References

1. Arroll, B., Goodyear-Smith, F., Crengle, S., Gunn, J., Kerse, N., Fishman, T., ... & Hatcher, S. (2010). Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to screen for major depression in the primary care population. The annals of family medicine, 8(4), 348-353.

2. Beard, C., Hsu, K. J., Rifkin, L. S., Busch, A. B., & Björgvinsson, T. (2016). Validation of the PHQ-9 in a psychiatric sample. Journal of affective disorders, 193, 267-273.

3. Bloch, M. H., & Leckman, J. F. (2009). Clinical course of Tourette syndrome. Journal of psychosomatic research, 67(6), 497-501.

4. Carlucci, S., Ivanova, I., Bissada, H., & Tasca, G. A. (2017). Validity and reliability of the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder self-report scale (ASRS-v1. 1) in a clinical sample with eating disorders. Eating behaviors, 26, 148-154.

5. Cravedi, E., Deniau, E., Giannitelli, M., Xavier, J., Hartmann, A., & Cohen, D. (2017). Tourette syndrome and other neurodevelopmental disorders: a comprehensive review. Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 11, 1-12.

6. Eapen, V., Snedden, C., Črnčec, R., Pick, A., & Sachdev, P. (2016). Tourette syndrome, co-morbidities and quality of life. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 50(1), 82-93.

7. Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Leiberg, S., Langner, R., Kichic, R., Hajcak, G., & Salkovskis, P. M. (2002). The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory: development and validation of a short version. Psychological assessment, 14(4), 485.

8. Foa, E. B., Kozak, M. J., Salkovskis, P. M., Coles, M. E., & Amir, N. (1998). The validation of a new obsessive–compulsive disorder scale: The Obsessive–Compulsive Inventory. Psychological assessment, 10(3), 206.

9. Groth, C. (2018). Tourette syndrome in a longitudinal perspective. Clinical course of tics and comorbidities, coexisting psychopathologies, phenotypes and predictors. Dan Med J, 65(4), 1-24.

10. Isaacs, D., Key, A. P., Cascio, C. J., Conley, A. C., Riordan, H., Walker, H. C., ... & Claassen, D. O. (2022). Cross-disorder comparison of sensory over-responsivity in chronic tic disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 113, 152291.

11. Isaacs, D., Key, A. P., Cascio, C. J., Conley, A. C., Walker, H. C., Wallace, M. T., & Claassen, D. O. (2020). Sensory hypersensitivity severity and association with obsessive-compulsive symptoms in adults with tic disorder. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 2591-2601.

12. Isaacs, D. A., Riordan, H. R., & Claassen, D. O. (2021). Clinical correlates of health-related quality of life in adults with chronic tic disorder. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12, 619854.

13. Kessler, R. C., Adler, L., Ames, M., Demler, O., Faraone, S., Hiripi, E. V. A., ... & Walters, E. E. (2005). The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychological medicine, 35(2), 245-256.

14. Kessler, R. C., Adler, L. A., Gruber, M. J., Sarawate, C. A., Spencer, T., & Van Brunt, D. L. (2007). Validity of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self‐Report Scale (ASRS) Screener in a representative sample of health plan members. International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 16(2), 52-65.

15. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Monahan, P. O., & Löwe, B. (2007). Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Annals of internal medicine, 146(5), 317-325.

16. Levis, B., Benedetti, A., & Thombs, B. D. (2019). Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis. bmj, 365.

17. Löwe, B., Decker, O., Müller, S., Brähler, E., Schellberg, D., Herzog, W., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2008). Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical care, 266-274.

18. Narapareddy, A., Eckland, M. R., Riordan, H. R., Cascio, C. J., & Isaacs, D. A. (2022). Altered Interoceptive Sensibility in Adults With Chronic Tic Disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 914897.

19. Piedad, J. C. P., & Cavanna, A. E. (2016). Depression in Tourette syndrome: A controlled and comparison study. Journal of the neurological sciences, 364, 128-132.

20. Rutter, L. A., & Brown, T. A. (2017). Psychometric properties of the generalized anxiety disorder scale-7 (GAD-7) in outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 39, 140-146.

21. Sawaya, H., Atoui, M., Hamadeh, A., Zeinoun, P., & Nahas, Z. (2016). Adaptation and initial validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 Questionnaire (GAD-7) in an Arabic speaking Lebanese psychiatric outpatient sample. Psychiatry research, 239, 245-252.

22. Simonds, L. M., Thorpe, S. J., & Elliott, S. A. (2000). The Obsessive Compulsive Inventory: Psychometric properties in a nonclinical student sample. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28(2), 153-159.

23. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of internal medicine, 166(10), 1092-1097.

24. Szejko, N., Robinson, S., Hartmann, A., Ganos, C., Debes, N. M., Skov, L., ... & Cath, D. C. (2022). European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders—version 2.0. Part I: assessment. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(3), 383-402.

25. Van de Glind, G., van den Brink, W., Koeter, M. W., Carpentier, P. J., van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen, K., Kaye, S., ... & IASP Research Group. (2013). Validity of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) as a screener for adult ADHD in treatment seeking substance use disorder patients. Drug and alcohol dependence, 132(3), 587-596.

Abstract

Background:
In tic disorders, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), depression, and anxiety are highly comorbid. Screening instruments for these conditions have been validated in the general population but it remains uncertain whether identical cut-points are applicable to individuals with tic disorders. This study assesses whether the established cut-points in four commonly used instruments (General Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9], Adult ADHD Self
Report Scale [ASRS], Obsessive Compulsive Inventory [OCI]) are suitable for adults with tic disorders.

Methods:
36 adults diagnosed with tic disorders completed these screening instruments and a diagnostic psychiatric interview. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated (area under the receiver- operating characteristic curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative-predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio) for each instrument at various cut-points.

Results and conclusions:
Based on the psychiatric interview, the prevalence of anxiety, depression, OCD and ADHD were 41.7%, 16.7%, 27.8% and 63.9%, respectively. In our sample of people with tics, the established cut-point to indicate a positive screening score in the general population had the following sensitivities, specificities, and AUC: GAD-7 ≥10 (sensitivity 66.67%, specificity 71.43%, AUC 80%), PHQ-9 ≥10 (sensitivity 100.00%, specificity 40.00%, AUC 74%), ASRS ≥14 (sensitivity 82.61%, specificity 76.92%, AUC 83%), OCI ≥40 (sensitivity 70%, specificity 61.5%, AUC 81%). The best performing tools were ASRS and OCI, followed by GAD-7 and PHQ-9. Further research is needed to develop specific measurements for the assessment of comorbidities in patients with tics.



Back
Add to Calendar